In 2024, the UK saw a series of record-breaking health and safety fines, underscoring the critical importance of workplace safety compliance. These penalties highlight the increasing focus of regulators on ensuring businesses protect their employees, customers, and the public from preventable risks. For organizations, these cases are more than just headlines—they are stark reminders of the financial, operational, and reputational consequences of failing to meet safety standards.
This blog takes a closer look at the top 10 highest health and safety fines issued in 2024, unpacking the incidents, the lessons learned, and what businesses can do to avoid similar pitfalls. Whether you’re in construction, manufacturing, retail, or any other sector, these cases provide valuable insights to help your organization stay compliant and safeguard its workforce.
The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) is the UK’s primary regulator for workplace health and safety. Its mission is to prevent work-related death, injury, and ill-health by enforcing the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 and other related legislation. The HSE conducts inspections, investigates incidents, and has the authority to impose fines on organizations found in breach of safety regulations.
The size of a health and safety fine depends on several factors:
These fines aim to deter organizations from cutting corners on safety while emphasizing the value of protecting lives.
In recent years, UK health and safety fines have been on the rise, with regulators taking a tougher stance on non-compliance. The sentencing guidelines introduced in 2016 placed more emphasis on proportional fines relative to company turnover, leading to multi-million-pound penalties for larger corporations.
2024 continues this trend, with substantial fines reflecting both the gravity of incidents and the need to hold businesses accountable. High-profile cases demonstrate that regulators are paying close attention to industries with significant risks, including construction, manufacturing, and logistics.
In August, DP World Southampton, a logistics company, was fined £1 million after an employee fell over 10 metres while working at height, suffering severe injuries. The incident occurred due to inadequate fall prevention systems and insufficient training, highlighting the importance of comprehensive risk assessments when working at height.
In June, Tata Chemicals Europe Limited was fined £1.1 million after a tragic incident at their Northwich chemical plant. An employee died after complications from chemical and thermal burns caused when his foot slipped into a trough containing calcium hydroxide, commonly known as "milk of lime."
In May, a Yorkshire-based metals recycling company faced a £1.2 million fine after a worker was struck by a wagon at a processing site. The investigation revealed a lack of safe vehicle-pedestrian segregation and insufficient site controls.
In November, the owner of Ginsters pasties was fined £1.28 million after an employee was tragically crushed to death by a lorry delivering supplies to their bakery. Investigations highlighted failures in site safety procedures for delivery vehicles.
In June, Openreach Limited received a £1.34 million fine after an engineer died while attempting to repair a telephone line. The incident was attributed to inadequate risk assessments and failure to ensure safe working conditions.
In November, an unnamed company was fined £1.6 million after a 24-year-old employee was crushed to death by poorly secured equipment. The investigation revealed severe lapses in equipment maintenance and safety protocols.
In January, Veolia ES (UK) Limited was fined £2.15 million when an agency worker was fatally struck by a loading shovel at its Hartlepool site. The company failed to enforce vehicle safety protocols and did not adequately train workers on safe equipment use.
In June, a construction company faced a £2.34 million fine following the death of a worker who drowned after falling into a river during a construction project. The investigation revealed insufficient fall protection and poor emergency preparedness.
In July, Veolia ES (UK) Limited was fined £3 million after an incident during the decommissioning of a North Sea gas rig resulted in one death and a serious injury. The company failed to provide safe systems of work and adequate supervision.
Topping the list, National Grid was fined £3.2 million in 2024 after a worker suffered life-altering burns while working on a pylon. The incident was attributed to inadequate safety protocols for live electrical systems.
As the number of health and safety violations and resulting fines continues to rise, it is critical for organizations across all industries to take stock of the lessons learned from the highest-profile cases in 2024. By analyzing these incidents, we can identify key actions that employers must take to prevent similar tragedies and avoid costly penalties.
A recurring theme in many of these high-profile cases is the failure to conduct thorough risk assessments. Whether it's identifying fall hazards, chemical exposures, or machinery risks, companies must prioritize proactive safety evaluations. A comprehensive risk assessment helps identify potential dangers and implement control measures before accidents occur. In cases such as the death of the worker at DP World Southampton and the drowning incident at BAM Nuttall Ltd, poor planning and inadequate risk evaluations led to preventable injuries and fatalities.
Action: Ensure all worksite activities undergo a detailed risk assessment that includes hazard identification, evaluation, and mitigation strategies. Regularly update these assessments to address new risks as operations evolve.
High-risk industries, particularly those involving chemicals, heavy machinery, and live electrical systems, require stricter safety protocols. In the cases of Tata Chemicals and Veolia Recycling, incidents were linked to failures in adhering to established safety guidelines. For example, the tragic incident at Tata Chemicals, where an employee succumbed to chemical burns, could have been prevented with better adherence to chemical safety procedures.
Action: Companies in high-risk industries must ensure that all safety protocols are consistently followed, especially when handling hazardous materials or working in dangerous environments. Regular safety audits, training, and updates to procedures are essential.
The crushing death at Lyndon SGB and the fatal accident involving Veolia's loading shovel highlight the critical importance of regular equipment maintenance. Poorly maintained or improperly secured equipment can have catastrophic consequences.
Action: Establish routine inspection schedules for all machinery, tools, and safety equipment. Implement a preventive maintenance program that ensures all equipment is in safe working condition, and invest in employee training to spot and report potential equipment failures.
Many of the incidents involved companies that failed to properly train their employees. In particular, the accident at Ginsters and Openreach’s fatality could have been avoided with better training and awareness of the specific hazards associated with their respective roles.
Action: Continuous training should be mandatory, especially for high-risk tasks. Workers must be fully educated about the potential hazards they may face and how to operate equipment safely. This training should be regularly refreshed, and employees should be tested on their knowledge of safety procedures.
Several cases pointed to failures in site safety management. At Veolia’s decommissioning site, for example, a lack of adequate supervision and safe systems of work led to one worker's death and another's serious injury.
Action: Ensure that every worksite has a designated safety officer or supervisor who is responsible for overseeing safety protocols. Supervisors should be adequately trained to spot safety issues and take immediate corrective actions. Additionally, companies should implement clear communication strategies to make sure all workers understand the hazards and safety procedures on site.
Accidents involving vehicles, such as the ones at CF Booth Limited and Ginsters, were attributed to poor site management and inadequate segregation between vehicles and workers. This highlights the need for clear, enforced safety procedures around vehicles, particularly in busy, high-traffic areas like construction and recycling sites.
Action: Companies should implement clear pedestrian and vehicle segregation systems, including barriers, signage, and designated walkways. All employees should be trained in vehicle safety protocols, and regular site inspections should ensure these protocols are followed.
The drowning incident at BAM Nuttall Ltd underscores the need for effective emergency preparedness. Had proper emergency response plans been in place and life-saving equipment readily available, the outcome could have been different.
Action: Every site, particularly those near water or with other hazardous conditions, should have an emergency response plan in place. This includes providing appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE), first aid training for workers, and clear, accessible evacuation routes.
Perhaps the most fundamental lesson is the importance of building a safety-first culture across all levels of an organization. Companies like National Grid and Veolia, which faced massive fines for safety failures, show that even large corporations can suffer from systemic safety issues. The key is not only enforcing safety regulations but also fostering a culture of accountability where every worker is responsible for their own safety and that of their colleagues.
Action: Foster a safety-first culture at all levels of the company, from top management to frontline workers. This includes clear communication about safety expectations, accountability for safety lapses, and recognition for adherence to best practices.
By learning from these tragic incidents, companies can take actionable steps to improve their health and safety practices, prevent future accidents, and avoid devastating fines. Ensuring that safety is a priority at every level of an organization is not only crucial for worker well-being but also for the long-term success and reputation of the business.
Health and safety fines are not just financial penalties—they are wake-up calls for businesses to reevaluate their safety practices and workplace culture. Companies that invest in robust safety systems, continuous training, and proactive risk management are not only protecting their workers but also safeguarding their long-term financial health, reputation, and ability to grow in an increasingly competitive market.
We think you'll also find the articles below really useful
Join 5,000 H&S professionals and sign up for the spacebands monthly newsletter and get the latest blogs, free resources, tools, widgets and a dose of health & safety humour.
spacebands is a multi-sensor wearable that monitors external, environmental hazards, anticipates potential accidents, and gives real-time data on stress in hazardous environments.
